According to the short-sighted catchphrase "kill the messenger", the same "prosecutor minders", more concerned about the image of the High Council of Prosecutors than about the legality of its decisions, turned to the Ethics Committee asking for a statement on whether those who dared to think about the legality decision violated the Code of Ethics. I am convinced that the goal of this address was to achieve that chilling effect, known in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, which serves to deter colleagues from critical thinking and freedom of speech
27-01 Svetlana-Nenadic-blu...
In the middle of last month, the newly formed High Council of Prosecutions (HPC) carried out the election of public prosecutors and chief public prosecutors. The election was preceded by legal dilemmas regarding the relationship between the old and the new law, given that all actions in the election procedure were undertaken according to previously valid laws and by the State Council of Prosecutors. The Court of Justice also had consultations with relevant actors, in which the Association of Prosecutors of Serbia also participated. On that occasion, we pointed out that, from the point of view of the legality of the proceedings, it would be problematic for the Supreme Court to make a decision on the selection based on the procedure carried out under the previously valid law, and we gave a series of legal arguments, as well as proposals for solving this problem. The suggestions were not listened to and the HJS made a decision on the selection which, in our understanding, violated or misapplied several provisions of the Law on Public Prosecution and the right to a fair trial.
As the new Law on Public Prosecution foresees a legal remedy against the selection decision, the assessment of the legality of the actions of the Supreme Court will be at the Constitutional Court. This procedure will be particularly interesting because the Constitutional Court, for the first time after the so-called of the 2010 re-election, to deal with the election of public prosecutors. It remains to be seen whether the US will maintain its position from the re-election that judicial councils are "tribunals" that have the obligation to respect the right to a fair trial and whether they will accept the modern trends of increased protection of the status of judges and prosecutors noticeable in the recent practice of the European Court of Human Rights.
However, instead of the Supreme Court dealing with the consideration of the merits of criticisms, especially those that point to potential illegalities and non-compliance with international standards, this Prosecutor's Council will deal with those who make those criticisms. According to the short-sighted catchphrase "kill the messenger", the same "prosecutor minders", more concerned about the image of the Council than about the legality of its decisions, turned to the Ethics Committee asking for a statement on whether those who dared to think about the legality of the decisions had violated Code of Ethics. I am convinced that the goal of this address was to achieve that chilling effect, known in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, which serves to deter colleagues from critical thinking and freedom of speech.
We can only hope that the Court of Justice, when deciding whether, who and how violated the Code of Ethics, will remember that a new set of judicial laws was adopted, which amended the provision on the immunity of public prosecutors, and which stipulates that no prosecutor may be called to account for the opinion expressed in connection with the performance of the office.
The challenges facing VST are great. The legal changes are substantial and numerous. Above all, the European standards for the conduct of judicial councils have been tightened and these bodies, when deciding on the rights and obligations of prosecutors, are obliged, as courts, to apply all standards of the right to a fair trial. It would be useful if the Court of Justice would deal more with legal arguments concerning the legality of actions, and less with image issues, because this is the way to instill confidence in the work, given that the court in a democratic society should "inspire public confidence in fairness" procedure".
The author is a member of the Presidency of the Association of Public Prosecutors
What is happening in the country and the world, what is in the newspapers and how to pass the time?
Every Wednesday at noon In between arrives by email. It's a pretty solid newsletter, so sign up!
How were the cases kept out of control, the investigations directed towards the citizens who sought protection, and the prosecutors were left without answers from the police? Branko Stamenković talks about the findings of the commission of the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, the responsibility of his colleagues and what is needed for the institutions to work according to the law again
Who now decides on the Government and the program, the plenum or the deputy? There are different views on this in the Student Movement and among the people on the list, but a middle solution is being sought, "Vreme" learns. Be that as it may, the program of over a thousand pages already exists
The outgoing government treats the state like an apartment from which it moves out after losing a dispute. And all the time she shouts loudly that her neighbors are demolishing the building
"The main priority of the new government should be the preservation of employment and the growth of the standard of the population. And this will not be easy to achieve at all, because we will have a decline in employment in clientelistic companies that cooperated with the former regime. Some will close, but the important thing is that many people will lose their jobs. In the case of large private companies that are experiencing difficulties, the government should commit to better owners taking over these companies in order to save thousands of jobs. We will already have this case with Davora Macure's companies, among which is "Idea"
How much money from the Growth Plan has been irretrievably lost for us, how much has been frozen and how much is still waiting for us? What should Serbia do in order to receive these European funds and what will the citizens get from it? Is a new chapter in Brussels-Belgrade relations beginning?
At the moment when the institutions of the Republic are destroyed, when Vučić's octopus is still alive, when people are disgusted by the injustice and the stench left behind by the Essenes regime, we have, as Machiavelli said, only civic virtue as the fuel with which we can return to the beginning
The four independent members of REM are an example of perseverance and civic responsibility. Rodoljub Šabić even, upon leaving the premises of REM, after the sentencing of the Informer, experienced that the Essenes insulted him, hit him with their hands and feet. But that too will soon be over
Vučić pardoned the batterers and Dijana Hrkalović. The election winners should abolish the sultan's power that allows one man to run afoul of the entire judicial system
The archive of the weekly Vreme includes all our digital editions, since the very beginning of our work. All issues can be downloaded in PDF format, by purchasing the digital edition, or you can read all available texts from the selected issue.
