img
White City, 6°C
Time Logo
  • Sign up
  • Subscription
0
  • Newest
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Society
  • The World
  • 2026 Elections
  • Culture
  • Mozaik
  • Comment
  • Printed edition
  • Archive
  • Newsletter
  • Podcast
  • Newest
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Society
  • The World
  • 2026 Elections
  • Culture
  • Mozaik
  • Comment
  • Printed edition
  • Archive
  • Newsletter
  • Podcast

Latest Edition

Add to cart

The World

Russia's reaction to the US response to the Russian draft European security agreement: Rejecting the rejected

February 18, 2022, 11:55 am M.M
Photo: AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko
US ignores Russia's concerns: Vladimir Putin
Copied

As Washington continues to accuse Russia of massing troops and preparing to invade Ukraine, the Russians say the US is ignoring Russian concerns about US nuclear weapons in non-nuclear European countries and NATO's eastward expansion, and warn that Ukraine's admission to NATO could lead to conflict. alliance with Russia due to the status of Crimea, which Russia considers closed. Moscow also denies that it planned or plans to invade Ukraine

On February 17, 2022, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia handed the Ambassador of the United States of America to Russia, John Sullivan, Russia's reaction to the previously received the American response to the Russian draft agreement between the Russian Federation and the USA on security guarantees.

In Russia's reaction to the US response to its previously written proposals, it is said that "the nature of the Russian proposals" to negotiate the entire package was "ignored", but that "convenient" topics were deliberately chosen that ensure the advantage of the US and its allies. This approach, as well as the accompanying rhetoric of American officials, "increase legitimate doubts that Washington is truly committed to improving the European security situation," says the letter, the content of which was published by the TASS agency.

It is particularly emphasized that the USA did not react to the Russian proposal to withdraw nuclear weapons deployed outside its borders, and that in the future they will not be stationed outside the national territory.

It goes on to say that the US only mentions "strategic dialogue on non-strategic nuclear weapons", and does not take into account the problem of deployment of such weapons and other factors affecting security.

It is noted that on the territory of some non-nuclear states NATO keeps American nuclear weapons capable of hitting targets on the territory of Russia. The Russians demand the elimination of the infrastructure for the rapid deployment of such weapons in Europe, as well as the termination of the NATO practice of involving non-nuclear NATO member states in training and exercises in the handling of these weapons. Without eliminating this irritating problem, a discussion on the topic of non-strategic nuclear weapons is not possible, states the Russian response.

Still: The US reiterates its "strong support" for NATO's "open door" policy. But that, the Kremlin claims, is in contradiction with the basic obligations assumed within the CSCE/OSCE framework, primarily with the determination "not to strengthen security at the expense of the security of others." This policy is not in accordance with the guidelines of the alliance itself, which, after the meeting of NATO foreign affairs ministers on June 6 and 7, 1991 in Copenhagen, undertook to "not take unilateral advantage of the changed situation in Europe", to "not endanger legitimate interests" of other states, not to strive for their "isolation" or "implementation of new lines of division".

The Russian letter says that increasing US and NATO military activity near Russia's borders is "alarming," while Russia's "red lines" and essential security interests, as well as Russia's sovereign right to protect them, continue to be ignored. The ultimate "requests for the withdrawal of troops from certain areas on Russian territory, accompanied by threats of tougher sanctions," are unacceptable and undermine the prospects of reaching real agreements.

The Russian side says that there is no planned "Russian invasion" of Ukraine, which the US and its allies have been talking about on an official level since last fall. Statements about Russia's "responsibility for the escalation" are interpreted by Moscow as an attempt to exert pressure and devalue Russia's demand for security guarantees.

Russia also rejects the accusations in the American response that it "occupied Crimea", explaining that in 2014 a coup d'état took place in Kiev, the initiators of which, with the support of the USA and its allies, set out to create a nationalist state that encroaches on the rights of the Russian population, and that in such a situation Crimeans voted for reunification with Russia. It is argued that the decision of the people of Crimea and Sevastopol to return to the Russian Federation was made by free will in exercising the right to self-determination enshrined in the UN Charter. No force or threat of force was used. It is emphasized that the issue of Crimea's membership is closed.

Russia warns that there is a real threat that the regime in Kiev, upon possible admission to NATO, could try to "take back" Crimea by force, thus drawing, in accordance with Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, the USA and its allies into a direct armed conflict with Russia with all the consequences which arise from it.

Russia also rejects the US thesis that it "ignited the conflict in Donbass" and reiterates that the reasons for the outbreak of that conflict are of a domestic, Ukrainian nature. The solution is possible only by applying the Minsk agreement and a series of measures whose sequence and responsibility for implementation are clearly defined and unanimously confirmed by Resolution 2202 of the UN Security Council, which was also signed by the USA, France and Great Britain. In paragraph 2 of this resolution, Kyiv, Donetsk and Lugansk are listed as parties. None of these documents mention Russia's responsibility for the conflict in Donbass. Russia, together with the OSCE, plays the role of a mediator in the main negotiation format - the contact group - and together with Berlin and Paris - in the Normandy format, which formulates recommendations to the parties to the conflict and monitors their implementation, the Russian document says.

It is repeated that in the absence of the willingness of the American side to agree on firm, legally binding security guarantees, Russia will be forced to respond, including the implementation of military-technical measures, but it is not specified what kind.

MM/TASS

 

Read daily news, analysis, commentary and interviews at www.vreme.com

Tags:

annexation of Crimea Krim conflict escalation Ukrainian crisis John Sullivan OSCE Washington expansion of NATO to the east draft agreement between the Russian Federation and the USA on security guarantees security of Europe SAD European security NATO Russian invasion Rusija Washington Treaty Moscow
Copied

In between

What is happening in the country and the world, what is in the newspapers and how to pass the time?
Every Wednesday at noon In between arrives by email. It's a pretty solid newsletter, so sign up!

More from the News section

News

13.November 2026 M.T.

Telecom and IT sector public procurement available on two new websites

A group of individuals has created two websites where public procurement of the Telecom and IT sectors can be searched and compared. They invite the media, experts and citizens to review the documentation and submit reasoned observations

News

13.November 2026 MLJ

Where is Milan Radoičić?

Very soon it could become obvious whether Milan Radoičić has left Serbia or not

Analyze

13.November 2026 Jovana Gligorijevic

After the death of a woman in labor at KBC Zvezdara: Black statistics in the 21st century

The hospital formed a commission for an extraordinary expert check and informed the health inspection. Cases of death during childbirth in Serbia rarely receive a judicial epilogue.

News

13.November 2026 M.T.

The unions of RTS and RTV supported the students' request for information of public importance

Two unions of public services supported the request of FDU students for information about RTS employees, since claims appeared in the public that it was a request for "files". The students say they are looking for "public truth about public service."

Vucic

News

13.November 2026 M.T.

The striker from Kosjerić is among those pardoned, but - partially

Among those pardoned is the man who attacked a citizen who came to ask about the street in the office of the mayor of Kosjerić in April. The pardon applies only to one of the two offenses, and the injured party announces a constitutional appeal.

Comment
Victory, Celebration

Comment

In the beginning was virtue.

At the moment when the institutions of the Republic are destroyed, when Vučić's octopus is still alive, when people are disgusted by the injustice and the stench left behind by the Essenes regime, we have, as Machiavelli said, only civic virtue as the fuel with which we can return to the beginning

Ivan Milenkovic
Session of the Council of the Regulatory Body for Electronic Media

Comment

REM: Praise for perseverance

The four independent members of REM are an example of perseverance and civic responsibility. Rodoljub Šabić even, upon leaving the premises of REM, after the sentencing of the Informer, experienced that the Essenes insulted him, hit him with their hands and feet. But that too will soon be over

Ivan Milenkovic

Comment

Vučić's pardons: It is time to abolish the sultan's powers

Vučić pardoned the batterers and Dijana Hrkalović. The election winners should abolish the sultan's power that allows one man to run afoul of the entire judicial system

Nemanja Rujevic
See all
Time 1871
Last edition

Interview: Branko Stamenković, public prosecutor of the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office

A black picture and the breakdown of the rule of law subscribe
How to form a new government

Unity of freethinkers

Post-election America

Twilight of Trumpism

Interview: Ofer Kassif, Member of the Knesset, Israel

When Jews stand up for Palestinian rights

The Tradwives Movement

A novel that is fought over

See all

Archive

The archive of the weekly Vreme includes all our digital editions, since the very beginning of our work. All issues can be downloaded in PDF format, by purchasing the digital edition, or you can read all available texts from the selected issue.

See all
Time 1871 11.11 2026.
Time 1870 04.11 2026.
Time 1869 28.10 2026.
Time 1868 21.10 2026.
Time 1867 14.10 2026.
Time 1866 07.10 2026.
Time 1865 30.09 2026.
Time 1864 23.09 2026.
Time 1863 16.09 2026.
Time 1862 09.09 2026.
Time 1861 02.09 2026.
Time 1860 26.08 2026.
Time Logo
  • Editorial office
  • Subscription
  • Marketing
  • Terms of use
  • Newsletter
  • Projects
Follow us:

© 2026 Time, Belgrade. Developed by cubes

Mastercard Teacher visa Dina American Express Understanding WSPAY Visa-Secure Mastercard Secure