While society celebrates a multitude of choices as the pinnacle of freedom, the reality is different. We are witnessing a generation Z that is paralyzed by its own privileges, trapped in eternal self-questioning, unable to move in any direction because every direction looks both tempting and terrifying at the same time. The abundance of choices becomes a crippling burden. Why is that so?
When you teach German to future students who dream of living and studying in Germany, sooner or later they start asking you something that is not in the textbook: "What should I write?" That question is repeated, again and again, in different forms, sometimes quietly, in view, sometimes loudly, with restlessness: "Is it the real choice? "
"Freedom" "choice" has become the heaviest shackle of today's student. Paradoxically, the more options we have, the less able we are to make a decision and be satisfied with it. This phenomenon, which Alvin Toffler called "choice overload" back in 1970, is experiencing its culmination in the educational system today.
There are so many options that it seems like we live in a time of unlimited possibilities, when in fact we are trapped in a cage of our own indecision. In the past, the choice was simple: medicine, law, economics. Around the corner. Today there are: bioinformatics, artificial intelligence, sustainable development, digital marketing... terms that sound tempting but at the same time frighteningly vague. Well, all of that potentially in Berlin, Vienna, or even in Leipzig?
This story of student paralysis before choosing a college is just a microcosm of a much larger phenomenon. We all live in a world overloaded with options today. From choosing a life partner on dating apps, through choosing a career that can be changed with one online course, to choosing a place to live in a globalized world. Every decision became easier to make and harder to bear at the same time.
Imagine an eighteen-year-old standing in front of dozens of colleges, hundreds of majors and thousands of possible combinations. Instead of this variety filling him with a sense of freedom and possibility, it paralyzes him. In 2004, psychologist Barry Schwartz called this the "paradox of choice," a phenomenon where too many options lead to cognitive fatigue and reduced satisfaction with the final decision.
That paralysis is not just a metaphor. It manifests itself through insomnia, anxiety, depression. Young people feel as if any wrong decision can ruin their life. And all decisions feel wrong when there are too many of them.
The relationship between the number of choices and satisfaction is not linear. Instead, it follows a so-called "Inverted U-Curve". In the beginning, a little choice is better than none. The sweet spot is somewhere around 5-7 distinct options. But today's student has been pushed far to the right on that curve, where the abundance of choices becomes a crippling burden.
This is not just a theoretical construct. We see her every day in classrooms, at consultations, in student dormitories. We see it in the eyes of graduates who come to college open days, armed with brochures and statistics, yet completely lost in the sea of information.
Because choosing a college is not a trivial decision like choosing a vacuum cleaner or a type of coffee. It is a life-defining decision. The pressure is huge. Young people must simultaneously evaluate their interests, abilities, financial possibilities, employment prospects, study location.
And while society celebrates a multitude of choices as the pinnacle of freedom, the reality is different. We are witnessing a generation that is paralyzed by its own privileges, trapped in eternal questioning, unable to move in any direction because every direction seems both tempting and terrifying at the same time.
A system designed to empower the young has become a source of deep psychological distress. Instead of setting them free, he overwhelmed them with possibilities that paralyze them. And perhaps that very paralysis is a symptom of a deeper problem: a system that has become more complex than our ability to deal with it.
The next time you see a student flipping through college brochures for hours, scrolling through university websites and still can't decide, know that it's not just indecision. It is a brain that has reached its biological limits.
The other day, in class, a high school senior nervously opened her phone to show me her "research." A colorful table with "for and against" columns appeared on the screen, filled with tiny letters. Red for eliminated options, yellow for those he is still considering, green for favorites. "Last week I was sure," she said quietly, "I translated everything into German, prepared the documents and went to apply. And then the Instagram algorithm, as if it knew what I was looking for, threw out an advertisement for a new program. More modern equipment, lower tuition fees, the possibility of internships there, but also here, in Serbia, over the summer..." She paused, sighed. "I withdrew my application the same day."
Her case is not an isolated one. It is only a visible manifestation of an invisible neurological collapse. At a time when social networks and search engines constantly serve us "better options", when every click opens up new possibilities, our brain is no longer just overloaded: it is in a state of permanent panic before the avalanche of choices that never stops coming.
Back in 1956, scientist George Miller discovered something fascinating: the human brain can process only "seven plus or minus two" pieces of information at a time. More recent research is even more pessimistic. Nelson Cowan claims the number is closer to four. Now imagine a student trying to compare dozens of colleges, each of which carries a wealth of information about the program, costs, location, prospects. His mind was not programmed for such a feat.
It's like trying to fit the contents of a large library into one small shoebox. Something has to fall out, break, deform. And this is exactly what happens in the mind of a future student. Not everything can stop, the system gets blocked.
Modern psychology has a name for this: Cognitive Load Theory. Just as a car engine has its limit after which it starts to heat up and hiccup, so our mind has a limit beyond which it simply cannot process new information. Every faculty website, every brochure, every tip... all of that is an additional burden on an already overstretched system.
On a Quora forum, an anonymous freshman wrote: "I applied to 12 colleges last year. I had a 4.8 GPA. Honored in high school for physics and music performance. I thought it would make my choice easier. Instead, I got accepted to 9 places. I didn't sleep for three months, lost a few pounds. I ended up flipping a coin. And I ended up not traveling anywhere. At least not yet." This sounds extreme, but it illustrates the crux of the problem.
In a world where every German, Austrian or Scandinavian university offers the promise of a better life, the map of possibilities becomes so detailed that it obscures the path itself. The statistics speak the language of the exodus: 84 percent of Gen Zers report facing a mental health crisis (Annie E. Casey Foundation (AECF), 2021), and among those planning to leave, that percentage (this is my guess) could be even higher.
The phenomenon of "decision fatigue" is particularly interesting. Like a battery that wears down, our ability to make decisions weakens throughout the day. Research shows that students who weigh options for too long later make worse choices and score lower on tests. A mind that is exhausted by the endless comparison of faculties will find it difficult to solve a simple mathematical problem.
Eventually, what psychologists call "paralysis of analysis" occurs: a condition in which a person analyzes so much that he becomes unable to make any decisions. Paradoxically, the more information we collect, the more insecure we are. A student makes complex spreadsheets, watches endless YouTube videos about college rankings, and ends up knowing less than he did at the beginning.
It's like walking into a restaurant with a menu of 500 dishes. Instead of being satisfied with so much choice, you end up paralyzed, unable to decide, maybe even hungry and leave the bar. Perhaps it is time to rethink the system that puts eighteen-year-olds in front of such a complex task. Because their brains are not prepared by evolution for this amount of choices.
Erik Erikson, one of the most influential developmental psychologists, identified late adolescence as a crucial time to address the psychosocial crisis of "Identity vs. Role Confusion." It is the period when a young person should answer the question "Who am I?".
Imagine trying to choose the perfect gift for someone you don't even know. Without knowledge of their interests, values, desires. Each choice seems equally possible and equally wrong. This is how a student feels in the process of choosing a college: like a stranger choosing a present for himself from the future.
It is particularly interesting how this diffusion of identity creates a vicious circle that psychologists call "maladaptive perfectionism." The less we know who we are, the more we seek external confirmation that we have made the right decision. Research consistently links "perfectionist concerns" and "socially prescribed perfectionism" to elevated "career anxiety" and a condition called "decisional stuck".
Modern technology has made this problem even more acute. Social networks have become a catalyst for what Herbert Simon calls "bounded rationality": a situation in which we try to make a perfectly rational decision under conditions that make it impossible. Simon identified two types of decision makers: "maximizers," who must find the absolute best option by reviewing all possibilities, and "satisficers," who look for an option that is "good enough." Paradoxically, maximizers are always less satisfied with their choices and more prone to regret.
You thought it was the hardest decision to make? You are mistaken. The real hell begins after you've finally decided. Choice overload isn't a one-time hit. It is a poison that slowly spreads through every pore of your academic life.
Psychologists call it a special type of anxiety that occurs after a decision. It's not just nervousness or stress. It's a toxic mix of regret, doubt, and obsessive questioning that can escalate into clinical depression. Freedom of choice, which should have been liberating, becomes a prison with windows through which you see everything you might have missed.
Economists have a cool term for this: "opportunity cost." That's the value of all missed opportunities. But when you have hundreds of possible colleges and majors in front of you, that cost becomes unbearable. Every missed option is like a small knife stabbing into your satisfaction with your chosen college. Even if you entered exactly what you wanted, the mere fact that there are so many alternatives makes your luck less likely.
Leon Festinger called this "cognitive dissonance," the mental discord that occurs when two opposing thoughts collide. "I chose this faculty" against the thought that has followed us for years: "The other one was still better". But with students, this dissonance is not just a matter of making the wrong choice. She is an existential threat. Because when you choose a university, you don't just choose a school. You choose the identity, who you will become.
And therein lies the crux of the problem. When you later doubt your choice of faculty, you don't think "I chose the wrong faculty." You think "I'm the wrong person". It is no longer just an academic decision. It's an identity crisis. And in the age of social networks, when algorithms constantly show you all the "better" options you've missed, that crisis becomes chronic.
The higher education system, with its obsession with "right choices" and "best decisions," has created a generation of young people who cannot enjoy what they have chosen because they are paralyzed by the thought of what they are not. It's no longer an education system, it's a remorse-producing machine.
It is said that the emperor from one of Borges' stories loved the map of his empire so much that he ordered it to be made life-size. Eventually the map covered the earth, and the emperor lost the world he wanted to understand. That image today is not a metaphor, it is a diagnosis. Gen Z lives on that very map, in a world of optimized university websites and glittering opportunities, where high-production campus videos (from a drone, why not?) and employment statistics cover the real life of the country below like a digital fog.
When we say they don't know what they want, when we accuse them of indecision or paralysis before a choice, we miss the point about today's graduates and students: they may be the first generation to see clearly that traditional compasses no longer point north. In a world where the only constant is change and the only certainty is uncertainty, their hesitation is not a flaw. That may be the only rational answer.
Like Borges's emperor, we too created a map that covered reality. But unlike the emperor, we lost not only the world on that map, but also those who should inherit it. Maybe it's time to stop blaming a generation for not being able to read a map and start questioning the system that has made reality a maze with no exit. Because today, when young people take to the streets of Belgrade, Paris, Berlin, Tbilisi... they are not just looking for new maps. They demand the right to chart their own path.
The author is a psychologist
Serbia is playing against Germany for points that could save it a place in the League of Nations. In front of almost empty stands, Paunović's team welcomes a selection that also has no room for error
The editors of "Vremena" received a request for denials to the article "Parents of Elementary School '20. Oktobar' tonight demand the resignation of the principal" published on October 29. We transmit it in its entirety and without changes
Like before Caro Claire Burke not only exposed the false image of a traditional woman in America, but also showed the level of women's rights in general - feminists claim. This novel is a direct attack on the traditional way of life - according to conservative Christian women
Forty years of a hairy creature who survived a nuclear disaster on Malmak, and everything he knows about America he learned from an advertising-paid program
In the underdeveloped south, where the saying Pyrrhic victory was born, where 813 men were killed because they did not want to convert to Islam, where the ancient Romans saw war elephants for the first time and many other unrepeatable things
At the moment when the institutions of the Republic are destroyed, when Vučić's octopus is still alive, when people are disgusted by the injustice and the stench left behind by the Essenes regime, we have, as Machiavelli said, only civic virtue as the fuel with which we can return to the beginning
The four independent members of REM are an example of perseverance and civic responsibility. Rodoljub Šabić even, upon leaving the premises of REM, after the sentencing of the Informer, experienced that the Essenes insulted him, hit him with their hands and feet. But that too will soon be over
Vučić pardoned the batterers and Dijana Hrkalović. The election winners should abolish the sultan's power that allows one man to run afoul of the entire judicial system
Interview: Branko Stamenković, public prosecutor of the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office
A black picture and the breakdown of the rule of law subscribeThe archive of the weekly Vreme includes all our digital editions, since the very beginning of our work. All issues can be downloaded in PDF format, by purchasing the digital edition, or you can read all available texts from the selected issue.
See all
