The fact that REM cannot apply objective monitoring criteria to "one big broadcaster" during the campaign threatens media pluralism, the equality of participants in parliamentary elections and equal conditions for the election game, according to four members of the REM Council.
Four members of the Council Regulatory Body for Electronic Media (REM) assessed in a letter to the representatives of the international community that the decision to TV Informer not being included in the system monitoring of the election campaign directly affects the integrity of the current election process.
Dubravka Valić Nedeljković, Ira Prodanov Krajišnik, Mileva Malešić and Rodoljub Sabic stated that the fact that REM cannot apply objective monitoring criteria to "one large broadcaster" during the campaign threatens media pluralism, equality of election participants and equal conditions selection matches, but also on the possibility of citizens to make a free and informed decision.
According to their opinion, the REM Council is formally constituted, but it is essentially blocked. Therefore, such a situation should not be seen as an internal dispute in the regulatory body, but as an indication that there are problems with meeting the conditions for holding free and fair elections, writes FoNet.
Four members of the Council recalled that they returned to REM precisely so that Serbia would not enter the election campaign without a functional media regulator. They felt that it was their responsibility to try to use every opportunity to get REM to fulfill its statutory role, but that the first serious test showed how difficult it was to achieve.
The REM service started monitoring the election campaign on September 10, even before the constitution of the new Council, using a sample taken from the monitoring methodology applied in 2023.
As part of that monitoring, 11 television channels are currently monitored, not including Informer.
At the session held on September 22, Šabić suggested that TV Informer be included in the sample. The council then decided that all members should submit proposals for expanding monitoring within 72 hours. All eight members of the Council then declared in writing that the Informer should be included in the sample, according to the letter.
However, when on September 28 it was to be formally decided on the expansion of the sample, four members changed their position. The voting ended with a result of four to four, so no decision was made.
The informant thus remained outside the system monitoring of the election campaign carried out by REM.
Valić Nedeljković, Prodanov Krajišnik, Malešić and Šabić assessed that such a development indicates a direct political influence on four members of the Council, and that this case should also be viewed in the context of earlier evaluations by the European Commission.
They reminded that the European Commission in a document from July 2026, speaking about the process of selecting REM members, assessed that the authorities and the parliament took a constructive approach and took the necessary technical steps that were under their control. Four members of the Council believe that the current situation requires a review of such assessment, because, as they stated, the formal constitution of REM should be clearly distinguished from the existence of a functional and independent regulator.
They also emphasized that their participation in the work of the Council should not be interpreted as a confirmation that the problems accompanying its work have been solved. Likewise, their willingness to compromise in order to make the institution work, in their opinion, should not be used as evidence that the REM is functioning normally.
Four members of the Council stated that they entered this institution in order to check whether it can perform its legal function, but that the first essential test showed that this is difficult to achieve. That is why they called on the European Union, OSCE/ODIHR and other international actors monitoring the elections in Serbia to formally record this case and take it into account when evaluating the election process.
They announced that they will continue to use all available legal mechanisms to demand that REM fulfill its statutory obligations. They also announced the public disclosure of any case in which the Council is prevented from implementing them, with the message that their participation in the work of the REM should not be used as evidence of the democratic legitimacy of the elections.
The letter was addressed to the head of the Delegation of the European Union in Serbia, the head of the OSCE/ODIHR Observation Mission for the elections in Serbia, the head of the OSCE Mission in Serbia, the head of the Office of the Council of Europe in Belgrade, the OSCE representative for freedom of the media, the European Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos, the rapporteur of the European Parliament for Serbia Tonino Pizzula, the institutions of the Council of the European Union and the European Commission, the heads of missions of the EU member states in Serbia, as well as the embassies of the USA, Great Britain, Norway and Switzerland.
Election time! And someone has to report to you independently. That's why it's in October annual subscription the digital edition of "Vremena" even 2.500 dinars cheaper. Choose now!
Two unions of public services supported the request of FDU students for information about RTS employees, since claims appeared in the public that it was a request for "files". The students say they are looking for "public truth about public service."
Among those pardoned is the man who attacked a citizen who came to ask about the street in the office of the mayor of Kosjerić in April. The pardon applies only to one of the two offenses, and the injured party announces a constitutional appeal.
Before the constitutive session of the new convocation, consultations were held with representatives of all the lists that entered the Assembly. The student movement said in advance that they will not turn those talks into political agreements.
The request for disqualification of the prosecutor delayed the implementation of the order for the arrest of the legal representatives of the "Millennium Team". The case has now been taken over by the First Basic Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade, which should continue the proceedings urgently
The tender for the construction of the mast at Ušće was suspended because no offer was received. In the city budget, only 5,4 million dinars are planned for this purpose, while no funds are planned for the next two years.
At the moment when the institutions of the Republic are destroyed, when Vučić's octopus is still alive, when people are disgusted by the injustice and the stench left behind by the Essenes regime, we have, as Machiavelli said, only civic virtue as the fuel with which we can return to the beginning
The four independent members of REM are an example of perseverance and civic responsibility. Rodoljub Šabić even, upon leaving the premises of REM, after the sentencing of the Informer, experienced that the Essenes insulted him, hit him with their hands and feet. But that too will soon be over
Vučić pardoned the batterers and Dijana Hrkalović. The election winners should abolish the sultan's power that allows one man to run afoul of the entire judicial system
Interview: Branko Stamenković, public prosecutor of the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office
A black picture and the breakdown of the rule of law subscribeThe archive of the weekly Vreme includes all our digital editions, since the very beginning of our work. All issues can be downloaded in PDF format, by purchasing the digital edition, or you can read all available texts from the selected issue.
See all
