Photo; PAThe EU announced that Aleksandar Vučić and Aljbin Kurti are expected to support the Declaration on Missing Persons as the first item on the agenda at the meeting on May 2. After that, the first draft of the statute of the Association of Serbian Municipalities will be discussed
A new meeting between Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić and Kosovo Prime Minister Aljbin Kurti has been officially scheduled.
The High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Policy and Security, Josep Borelj, called for Tuesday, May 2, a high-level meeting within the dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina in Brussels.
As not stated, the focus will be on the implementation of the agreement on the path to the normalization of relations.
"The parties are expected to support the Declaration on Missing Persons as the first item on the agenda, which will be followed by a presentation/discussion on the first draft of the statute of the Community of Municipalities with a Serbian majority in Kosovo." The parties will also have the opportunity to discuss current issues of political importance," the statement said.
Again he called Kurti a Gauleiter
Aleksandar Vučić told the representatives of the authorities in Pristina not to dream that they will succeed in expelling the Serbs from the north or any other part of Kosovo.
"In that case, we will know that we are doing our job," Vučić told the citizens in Sokobanja.
He emphasized that Serbia will do its best to preserve peace, but that Kosovo Prime Minister Aljbin Kurti only wants to expel the Serbs.
"Even today, the occupying Gauleiter in the north of Kosovo made a decision to open the bridge, which was a dam and a guardian for our people in northern Kosovska Mitrovica, should he not take it over," Vučić said.
Transformation of indictments
Kosovo Prime Minister Aljbin Kurti previously stated that he expects the issue of missing persons to be discussed at the meeting in Brussels.
He stated that in the Annex for the implementation of the agreement, it is specified that an urgent solution is needed in this matter.
"In the Annex for the implementation of the Ohrid Agreement, we agreed that the issue of the missing is urgent, and I expect it to be resolved urgently on May 2." It is necessary to transform the indictments for those responsible, as in Croatia, so that they can be tried in absentia. "Any delay is unreasonable, because the witnesses are getting old," said Kurti.
On February 27, in Brussels, Aleksandar Vučić and Aljbin Kurti agreed on the text of the agreement on the path to the normalization of relations between Kosovo and Serbia.
At the meeting held on March 18 in Ohrid, they also agreed on the annex to the implementation of all articles of the agreement.
The leaders did not sign the agreement, and international actors claim that both sides are obliged to implement all articles of the agreement.
BG/FoNet/Free Europe/Euronews Serbia
Read daily news, analysis, commentary and interviews at www.vreme.com
Why is there nothing else between the overcome regime and the changes? What does the regime mean when it says it is defending Serbia? Why is the Student Movement indomitable? Who has the knowledge and real experience, and who leads without a day of work experience outside of politics? And why students win
After almost two years of protests, hundreds of kilometers walked, arrests, persecution and unprecedented social mobilization, Serbia is holding elections that could mark the end of a political era. Sociologist Marija Babović tells "Vreme" that the hope for change has not been so great since October 5, 2000, but she also warns of the danger that, if changes are not made, the country will face an even tougher authoritarian regime.
Their only weapon now is the media they control: like, we don't have an agenda, which is not true; as, we will betray the national interest, which is not true. One of their arguments is that we are afraid to go to the debate with Vučić. They do not understand that it is their punishment. This is a punishment for Aleksandar Vučić, who for 14 years conducted exclusively a monologue. For fourteen years he did not allow anyone any kind of dialogue, and now he would like to be rewarded or pardoned with the opportunity to talk to us. Well, he won't be able to. What he sowed is now reaping
These elections are not elections about Serbia's membership in the European Union, Kosovo and Metohija, gay marriage, tax policy or any other single political issue. Although parties on the fringes of political power try to impose these themes, at the heart of the upcoming political election is a much simpler dilemma: change or preserve the existing order. For more than a year now, surveys have shown that this is the primary dilemma on the ballot
In the RS, 19.800 people registered for the elections in Serbia, who will be able to vote at 28 polling stations. It remains unknown how many of them will cross the Drina on October 25 and vote in Serbia. In any case, I do not believe that the voters from Republika Srpska are the ones who will decide the winner of the elections in Serbia. Realistically, the voters from Republika Srpska can influence a little, but it seems that they are symbolically very important to both Vučić and the opposition.
There is, literally, no difference between the one who claims it is day in the middle of the night, or the one who claims to be a giraffe, from the claims we read on billboards: that Vučić is working to unify Serbs and that Serbia is doing better and better day by day.
The pre-election arrests due to the alleged "overthrow of the state" testify to the regime's panic. The bad news for them is - they can't arrest the whole people who decided to defend themselves from progressive beatings and election theft
The ring that tightens around Ćaciland Student list is getting narrower. Because there are more and more spoiled people who see the false prophet for what he is: a street obscener who is fighting Serbia
The archive of the weekly Vreme includes all our digital editions, since the very beginning of our work. All issues can be downloaded in PDF format, by purchasing the digital edition, or you can read all available texts from the selected issue.
See all
It is true that the Ohrid agreement is binding without any signature, which the President of Serbia agreed to, but it is also true that he did not sign the agreement, which does not have to be signed to be binding, so an unsigned agreement is worth nothing because he did not sign it. although it does not need to be signed to be binding. Isn't that right? And anyone who says otherwise is a bastard, a liar, a traitor, a homosexual, a mercenary and hates his son. Rule based on contradictions is nothing new, Comrade Stalin also practiced it
The European plan for Kosovo is on the table and is no longer subject to negotiation. Kosovo Prime Minister Aljbin Kurti wanted to sign it because he foresees a further rounding of Kosovo's independence. Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić did not want to sign it because the Association of Serbian Municipalities was not formed. Both of them accepted it in principle. The tension over the implementation of the Plan and the formation of the ZSO continues
