Who reads? Inform and still believes him, he could think that he is the rector of Belgrade University Vladan Djokic "Veteran" from the student list.
Citing internal correspondence in the student movement, Informer writes that on 39 pages it was stated why Đokić is allegedly unfit to lead the list.
"Two episodes from his career are particularly problematic - his attitude towards the 'Belgrade on the Water' project while he was dean of the Faculty of Architecture and his handling of Sinisa Malog's doctorate while he was rector," the newspaper writes.
Similarly, the Informer writes that Professor Milo Lompar was "nogiran". In the attached excerpt of the document, it is stated that he was close to political parties, praised Radovan Karadžić and Milan Nedić, and publicly said that he did not want to be a member of parliament.
What is it about?
In another text, announced as a "mega-exclusive", the Informer shows a list of 99 names from the supposedly preliminary Student List, where it is clearly written that these are "candidates proposed for vetting".
"Time" is in the text "How to create a student list" explained in detail what it was all about.
In mid-July, the lists of possible candidates for MPs from six state universities were combined.
As the student movement, colorful by political convictions as well as the entire citizenry, held together from the beginning, it was clear to them that the list of candidates cannot be a patchwork carpet to which everyone adds what they want, without the consent of the others. That's why the famous "vetering" was introduced, which is currently underway at the level of the entire country.
The word has as many as eighty plenums and each of them can propose to remove any candidate from the list.
Petar Živković, a student at the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, explained to "Vreme" that each plenum can veto and explain why a candidate should not be on the list - whether it considers that he does not meet some of the criteria or that he does not share the values that the students stand for.
A veto motion is not a veto.
A plenum that objects to a candidate being on the list sends arguments to all other faculties, and other plenums have the opportunity to give opposing arguments. In the end, all faculties vote for each candidate, and in order for someone to be removed from the list, more than half of the total number of plenums must agree.
"Regardless of whether someone is vetted or not, it does not mean that he is not an ally in our fight. We have a lot of people who are in the role of advisers," Zivkovic said.
Therefore, some plenum had objections to 99 of the possible 250 candidates, which is not particularly surprising. It is likely that a much smaller number will actually be "vetted" in the end.
Now everything flows easily.
Actress and producer Bojana Maljević, who previously withdrew as a possible candidate because she thinks the "permanent veto" procedure is not good, recently wrote on the X network that the deadline for students to submit their first arguments, if they think someone should be vetoed, is expiring.
By the way, her letter reached the media close to the government in July.
"In the coming period it will be even worse, because just as my letter got into the tabloids - the entire 'arguments and counter-arguments of the students' in the vetting process, which now also has an eternal duration," Maljević wrote now.
As "Vreme" wrote, it is no wonder that since mid-July various correspondence, preliminary lists and other things have been leaking to the media from the Student Movement.
Because now all plenums have insight into everything instead of small working groups. Thus, thousands of students are involved.
There will be many more "megaexclusives" for tabloid employees. Student Petar Živković told "Vreme" that citizens will be able to see the real and final version of the Student List only when the elections are announced.
Only in August: Save three thousand dinars on the annual subscription to the digital edition of "Vremena"! Take advantage of the discount here and support independent journalism.
