"Betrayal is a choice," says Nina Shobota, a regular visitor Iceberg on social networks in a post about former Belgrade police chief Veselin Milić. He insults him, calls him derogatory names and claims that he fled to Croatia, which Aleksandar Vučić and other prominent progressives accuse of wanting to overthrow the government in Serbia together with the "blockaders".
Nina Šobota has been known to the general public since 2014, when she was wounded in front of the "Dzimis" raft in Belgrade, when the leader of the "Hyenas" fan group was killed. Velibor Dunjic. She was filmed at almost every meeting of the SNS, and among other things, she was a "victim of Šarović" because she made statements to the media in support of "students who want to study" in Ćaciland.
Shobota is thus harnessed in an intra-regime war that reaches the very top of the government.
Intra-regime war
The replaced Belgrade police chief, Veselin Milić, filed a criminal complaint in which he accused the leaders of the Criminal Police Directorate (UKP) of having, as the weekly "Radar" writes, "set up" the case of murder in Senjak.
"Radar" states that Milić, through his lawyers, submitted a report to the High Public Prosecutor's Office (VJT) in Belgrade, claiming that the head of the UKP, Marko Kričak, and the head of the Crime Suppression Service, Boško Sekulović, falsified evidence and put pressure on witnesses and suspects in order to adapt the facts to a pre-formed construction of events.
According to Radar, Milić accuses the two of them of abuse of official position, claiming that they presented the collected evidence against him "selectively, incompletely and untruthfully".
"Prearranged" construction against Milić
In the report filed against Milić, it was stated that he was present at the murder of Nešović on May 12 in the restaurant "27" and that he is charged with helping the perpetrators after the crime, removing evidence and not reporting the crime.
However, VJT assessed that the evidence, primarily surveillance camera footage, indicates that Milić was not in the restaurant at the time of the murder, after which he first gave up the prosecution of three members of his security, and then allowed Milić to defend himself from freedom, charging him only with not reporting the crime.
In the criminal complaint, Milić claims that Kricak and Sekulović were familiar with the security camera footage, the findings of mobile phone base stations, as well as the statements of other suspects and witnesses, but that they presented this evidence selectively and inaccurately.
"Their goal was to support the pre-arranged construction against Milić," the application states.
"Subsequently submitted and produced evidence, including spatio-temporal analysis, data on base stations and video recordings, did not confirm the allegations from the criminal complaint, but, on the contrary, led to its rejection," according to Milić's complaint.
It is added that Kricak and Sekulovic were obliged to provide the public prosecutor with "truthfully, completely and objectively presented material", and not a factual description that does not correspond to its actual content.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs did not answer the questions of "Vremena" about the current labor and legal status of Veselin Milić in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, whether he has been reinstated and, if so, in which position he is serving.
Only in August: Save three thousand dinars on the annual subscription to the digital edition of "Vremena"! _Take advantage of the discount here and support independent journalism.
