These are the "Djilas students", and the youth of the opposition parties. Or they took money to overthrow the government.
In that always similar vocabulary of the regime's propaganda, the "Blokadna kuharica" appears as a convenient, original decoration, which is intended to denigrate the students as anarchists who are guided by advice from the hated Croatia.
Or, as the progressive portal 24/7 writes, students use the "Ustasha" handbook.
"I haven't read 'Blokadna kuharica', so I don't know what it prescribes as the next step when someone fulfills your requirements?" wrote the President of the Assembly Ana Brnabić on Twitter this Thursday.
It happened after President Aleksandar Vučić on Wednesday ostensibly fulfilled the demands of the students, and they - so ungrateful - continued with the blockades, claiming that the demands were not fulfilled and that Vučić, after all, was not the address.
What kind of "chef" is that?
"Blokadna kuharica" is actually a booklet published at the end of 2009 by the Center for Anarchist Studies in Zagreb. The authors are unknown, that is, it is collectively signed by the students of the Faculty of Philosophy in Zagreb.
In this short guide, which is available in its entirety on the Internet, describes the experiences of organizing blockades at faculties in Croatia during 2009, when the main demand was free study.
It recommends the "plenary model of decision-making" which is also used by students in Serbia - but it was neither invented by the Croats nor was it reserved for anarchists.
The plenum is actually a kind of gathering of all "interested students", i.e. all those who want to participate. Everyone can speak there, decisions are made by majority.
In fact, the reporters of "Vremen" reported on multi-hour plenums, for example, at the Faculty of Political Sciences in Belgrade, where these principles are respected.
"In the plenum decision-making model, decisions are made collectively, there is no representation, so there can be no prominent individuals who would pretend to be the voice of the movement," writes "Blokadna kuharica".
In front of the media as a collective
Another specificity that is described there, and to some extent is also applied in Serbia, is the relationship with the media.
As stated, today's media are looking for faces, "spokesmen", but "it is necessary to break with this custom if we want to prevent the personalization and overshadowing of the plenum by privileged spokespersons".
"The most effective way to avoid this danger is the anonymity of all collective members," the booklet states.
Such blocking principles are not being used for the first time in Serbia, nor is it controversial among students to use experiences from other countries as well.
