"The Ecological Uprising will not attend any meetings if there is no live broadcast from beginning to end, so that the people can see what and how they discussed their fate and the fate of this country," Aleksandar Jovanović, president of the parliamentary group of the Ecological Uprising, told Vreme. She is silent.
He sent the request to broadcast the talks live to the President of the Assembly Ana Brnabić, but they have not yet received an answer.
"Ana, turn on the cameras and let's talk," says Ćuta and adds that, if by some miracle it is agreed, he will come to the meeting, and not that "after the meeting, there are various versions of who said what to whom." The people should see what it looks like, if Brnabić has nothing to hide."
He also emphasized that his colleagues from "Serbia against violence", who will go to the meeting, have his full support to fight for what is everyone's goal.
Coalitions of Serbia against violence and Nada will appear with a common position at the collegium of the Assembly, which was convened for April 1. On the agenda will be consultations regarding further work on the implementation of the recommendations of the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (ODIHR).
Members of the Working Group for cooperation with ODIHR in coordination and monitoring of the implementation of recommendations for improving the election process of the Government of Serbia were invited to the meeting, the statement added.
Ponoš: No big expectations
"We don't have high expectations, that's what we've experienced in previous talks with the authorities." But considering that we initiated that meeting, we will accept any attempt to talk, because we want to show good will," Zdravko Ponoš, president of the Serbia Center party, told Vreme.
Photo: Marija JankovićPonoš: We want to show good will
According to him, two coalitions will insist together on the fulfillment of the request for repeated Belgrade elections, noting that the elections do not make sense under the current conditions.
"I am the most skeptical about the topic of responsibility according to what has happened in the elections so far," Ponoš pointed out, and added that there will be no individual demands, but will stick to what was agreed with the coalition partners.
Ponoš sees the statements of the president of the municipality of Čajetin, Milan Stamatović, that it is okay to transfer voters from municipality to municipality, as Stamatović's political experience.
"He was threatened with the kidnapping of Čajetina, so he laid down on the ore. "I don't know what his motives are, but it's certainly not stupid, he's a very smart man," Ponoš said.
Opposition demands
The "Serbia Against Violence" coalition requested that a Lex specialis be passed before the elections, a law that would meet all their demands, including the formation of a commission to oversee the elections, revision of the voter list, and the implementation of all ODIHR recommendations. As previously stated by the opposition, a document was prepared with basic solutions that rely on the recommendations of ProGlas and NGO Crta.
Among the first demands is that the National Assembly form a special body, a commission for election control, which will include the opposition, civil society organizations and government representatives. That commission must have supervisory and executive powers and it is only a temporary solution, it is stated.
The voter list must be regulated and before the next elections are called, this issue must be resolved, i.e. enable the control of the voter list to a team of domestic and international experts, who would be appointed by the opposition. Also, a complete revision of the voter list must be started according to the methodology developed by Crta.
The opposition also demands that only those who have a registered residence in the municipality and city where they will vote for at least six months can vote in local elections.
As a special request, the abolition of the possibility for the holder of the list to be a person who is not at all a candidate in local elections is mentioned.
